AVIS-IBIS

Birds of Indian Subcontinent

Barn swallow mobbing: Self-defence, collateral kin defence, group defence, or parental care?

Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:1984
Authors:Shields, WM
Journal:Animal Behaviour
Volume:32
Issue:1
Date Published:1984
ISBN Number:0003-3472
Keywords:Hirundinidae, Hirundo, Hirundo rustica
Abstract:We presented stimuli (human and stuffed owl) to a marked population of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) during the 1980-1982 breeding seasons at the Cranberry Lake Biological Station, Saint Lawrence County, New York. In experiment 1, we presented the stimuli at various distances from active nests during various stages of the reproductive cycle. Both the probability and intensity of mobbing varied during the breeding season, increasing with the probable reproductive value of young of the year and the degree of danger posed to them. Mobbing group sizes varied positively with local nest densities. In experiment 2, we analysed mobbing group structure in greater detail. Barn swallow mobbing groups usually contained active mobbers (those that emitted mobbing calls, and approached the stimulus closely, < 2 m, or even hit it) and passive mobbers (which were silent and flew in circles at greater distances, 2-10 m, from the stimulus). Passive mobbers were a random sample of the local population with respect to sex, age, nest location and reproductive status. This pattern is consistent with a hypothesis that passive mobbing, the less risky type, is a form of self-defence that reduces an actor's chance of being eaten, probably by providing information about the identity or probable behaviour of potential predators. Active mobbers were not a random sample of the source population. Mated birds and especially parents with nestlings were over-represented, while non-breeders, juveniles and incubators rarely mobbed actively. The seasonal changes in mobbing and the identity of active and passive mobbers are inconsistent with hypotheses that mobbing is a form of cooperative group defence or altruism conditioned by reciprocity or kin or group selection. These data are however consistent with other hypotheses, which propose that mobbing benefits the mate or the young. Even though active mobbers may be at risk, they benefit directly by increasing the personal component of their inclusive fitness, probably by alerting mates and young and defending them from predators. In this light the behavioural complex of mobbing appears to be a form of parental care (active) as well as self-defence (passive) and mate defence (active).
URL:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347284803310
Short Title:Animal Behaviour
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith