AVIS-IBIS

Birds of Indian Subcontinent

Defining Quality of Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Foraging Habitat Based on Habitat Use and Fitness

Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2002
Authors:Walters, JR, Daniels, SJ, Carter, III, JH, Doerr, PD
Journal:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Volume:66
Issue:4
Date Published:2002
ISBN Number:0022541X
Keywords:Picidae, Picoides, Picoides borealis
Abstract:Accurate understanding of habitat quality is a critical component of wildlife management. We developed a definition of high-quality foraging habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), a federally endangered, cooperatively breeding bird species, from analyses of resource selection and habitat use, relationships between fitness measures and habitat features, and an extensive literature review. In the North Carolina Sandhills, use of foraging habitat at the level of individual trees, habitat patches, and forest stands was strongly and positively related to age and size of pines (Pinus spp.). Use of habitat patches and forest stands was greatest at intermediate densities of medium-sized and large pines and was negatively associated with hardwood and pine midstory. Size of red-cockaded woodpecker groups, an important fitness measure for this species, was positively related to density of old-growth pines within the home range and negatively related to density of medium-sized pines and height of hardwood midstory. Similar results were reported by 2 other studies. High-quality foraging habitat for red-cockaded woodpeckers, therefore, contains sparse or no midstory, intermediate densities of medium-sized and large pines, and old-growth pines in at least low densities. Although we documented a relationship between group size and the amount of habitat meeting our definition of "high quality," we were unable to identify the optimum amount of high-quality habitat to provide per group because most study groups had relatively little high-quality foraging habitat. Both fitness and habitat selection in our study population may be constrained by quality and quantity of foraging habitat. James et al. (2001) recommended, and we strongly agree, that foraging habitat be managed for abundant herbaceous ground cover, low densities of small and medium-sized pines, and moderate densities of large pines. We also stress the importance of old-growth pines in foraging habitat. Because the structure of high-quality foraging habitat is similar to that of high-quality nesting habitat, we recommend that management of these 2 be increasingly integrated.
URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/3802938
Short Title:The Journal of Wildlife Management
Taxonomic name: 
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith